CVE-2024-26958

nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

State
Published
Severity
7.8 High
Published
May 1, 2024
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Reserved
Feb 19, 2024

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

In production we have been hitting the following warning consistently

------------[ cut here ]------------ refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 Workqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x9f/0x130 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150 ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs] process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0 ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220 kthread+0xdc/0x120 ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is because we're completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a row.

The source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we process them and send them off, and then in the completion path for the commit requests we have

if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds)) nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);

However since we're submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes have one that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up calling complete on the nfs_direct_request twice.

The only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in __nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a

nfs_commit_begin(); nfs_commit_end();

Which is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one that is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq() calls around where we process events as well as in the completion paths.

Fix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.

Before with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop every 10ish minutes. With my patch the stress test has been running for several hours without popping.

Scores

CVSSScoreVectorSource
3.17.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HLinux

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 6cd3f13aaa62970b5169d990e936b2e96943bc6aAffected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 4595d90b5d2ea5fa4d318d13f59055aa4bf3e7f5Affected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 80d24b308b7ee7037fc90d8ac99f6f78df0a256fAffected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 3abc2d160ed8213948b147295d77d44a22c88fa3Affected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before e25447c35f8745337ea8bc0c9697fcac14df8605Affected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 1daf52b5ffb24870fbeda20b4967526d8f9e12abAffected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before cf54f66e1dd78990ec6b32177bca7e6ea2144a95Affected
  • af7cf057933f01dc7f33ddfb5e436ad598ed17ad to before 17f46b803d4f23c66cacce81db35fef3adb8f2afAffected
LinuxLinux
  • 4.5Affected
  • before 4.5Not affected
  • 5.4.297 through 5.4.*Not affected
  • 5.10.215 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.154 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.84 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.24 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.7.12 through 6.7.*Not affected
  • 6.8.3 through 6.8.*Not affected
  • 6.9 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.