CVE-2024-47659

smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling

State
Published
Severity
9.1 Critical
Published
Oct 9, 2024
Updated
Aug 5, 2026
Reserved
Sep 30, 2024

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling

Currently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections: when a label 'foo' connects to a label 'bar' with tcp/ipv4, 'foo' always gets 'foo' in returned ipv4 packets. So, 1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled ('foo' instead of 'bar') 2) 'bar' can write to 'foo' without being authorized to write.

Here is a scenario how to see this:

* Take two machines, let's call them C and S, with active Smack in the default state (no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels)

* At S, add Smack rule 'foo bar w' (labels 'foo' and 'bar' are instantiated at S at this moment)

* At S, at label 'bar', launch a program that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections

* From C, at label 'foo', connect to the listener at S. (label 'foo' is instantiated at C at this moment) Connection succeedes and works.

* Send some data in both directions. * Collect network traffic of this connection.

All packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO of the label 'foo'. Hence, label 'bar' writes to 'foo' without being authorized, and even without ever being known at C.

If anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP.

This behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below) and it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided.

I changed returned packes label into the 'bar', to bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.

Scores

CVSSScoreVectorSource
3.19.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NLinux

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before d3f56c653c65f170b172d3c23120bc64ada645d8Affected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before 5b4b304f196c070342e32a4752e1fa2e22fc0671Affected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before a948ec993541db4ef392b555c37a1186f4d61670Affected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before 0aea09e82eafa50a373fc8a4b84c1d4734751e2cAffected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before 0776bcf9cb6de46fdd94d10118de1cf9b05f83b9Affected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before 4be9fd15c3c88775bdf6fa37acabe6de85beebffAffected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before d3703fa94116fed91f64c7d1c7d284fb4369070fAffected
  • 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962 to before 2fe209d0ad2e2729f7e22b9b31a86cc3ff0db550Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 2.6.30Affected
  • before 2.6.30Not affected
  • 4.19.322 through 4.19.*Not affected
  • 5.4.284 through 5.4.*Not affected
  • 5.10.226 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.167 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.109 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.50 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.10.9 through 6.10.*Not affected
  • 6.11 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.