CVE-2025-23145

mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow

State
Published
Severity
7.5 High
Published
May 1, 2025
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Reserved
Jan 11, 2025

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow

When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in 'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req->msk is NULL.

Call trace:

mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P) subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854) tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863) tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268) ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207) ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234) ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254) ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449) ...

According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due to multiple reasons.

Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The 'subflow_req->msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first, and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here.

This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req->msk' under the `own_req == true` conditional.

Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the code has been moved to.

Scores

CVSSScoreVectorSource
3.17.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HLinux

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before 8cf7fef1bb2ffea7792bcbf71ca00216cecc725dAffected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before b3088bd2a6790c8efff139d86d7a9d0b1305977bAffected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before 855bf0aacd51fced11ea9aa0d5101ee0febaeadbAffected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before 7f9ae060ed64aef8f174c5f1ea513825b1be9af1Affected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before dc81e41a307df523072186b241fa8244fecd7803Affected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before efd58a8dd9e7a709a90ee486a4247c923d27296fAffected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before 4b2649b9717678aeb097893cc49f59311a1ecab0Affected
  • 9466a1ccebbe54ac57fb8a89c2b4b854826546a8 to before 443041deb5ef6a1289a99ed95015ec7442f141dcAffected
LinuxLinux
  • 5.9Affected
  • before 5.9Not affected
  • 5.10.237 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.181 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.135 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.88 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.24 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.13.12 through 6.13.*Not affected
  • 6.14.3 through 6.14.*Not affected
  • 6.15 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.