CVE-2025-68245

net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup

State
Published
Severity
Not scored
Published
Dec 16, 2025
Updated
May 11, 2026
Reserved
Dec 16, 2025

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup

commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") incorrectly ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev->npinfo to NULL during netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.

Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:

1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev->npinfo is allocated, and refcnt = 1 - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In this case, there is just one.

2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and npinfo->refcnt += 1. - Now dev->npinfo->refcnt = 2; - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.

3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up: - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np->dev->npinfo, ignoring refcnt. - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);` - Set dev->npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup - No ->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called

4) Now the second target tries to clean up - The second cleanup fails because np->dev->npinfo is already NULL. * In this case, ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll instance) - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by kmemleak.

Revert commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") and adds clarifying comments emphasizing that npinfo cleanup should only happen once the refcount reaches zero, ensuring stable and correct netpoll behavior.

Scores

The record has no CVSS score.

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 8e6a50edad11e3e1426e4c29e7aa6201f3468ac2Affected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 9b0bb18b4b9dc017c1825a2c5e763615e34a1593Affected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 890472d6fbf062e6de7fdd56642cb305ab79d669Affected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 4afd4ebbad52aa146838ec23082ba393e426a2bbAffected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before c645693180a98606c430825223d2029315d85e9dAffected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before c79a6d9da29219616b118a3adce9a14cd30f9bd0Affected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 9a51b5ccd1c79afec1c03a4e1e6688da52597556Affected
  • efa95b01da18ad22af62f6d99a3243f3be8fd264 to before 49c8d2c1f94cc2f4d1a108530d7ba52614b874c2Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 3.17Affected
  • before 3.17Not affected
  • 5.4.302 through 5.4.*Not affected
  • 5.10.247 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.197 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.159 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.117 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.59 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.17.9 through 6.17.*Not affected
  • 6.18 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.