CVE-2026-45920

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

State
Published
Severity
Not scored
Published
May 27, 2026
Updated
May 27, 2026
Reserved
May 13, 2026

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count:

WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4]

Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller ext4_mb_new_blocks().

First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point, so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar->len out path which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating the inconsistency.

To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster reservation in this codepath, lift the counter reduction to a single place in the caller. This makes it more clear that ext4_mb_new_blocks() is responsible for acquiring cluster reservation (via ext4_claim_free_clusters()) in the !delalloc case as well as releasing it, regardless of whether it ends up consumed or returned due to failure.

Scores

The record has no CVSS score.

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 523d5a4df3c649fa305c89efb552ec62a1ce9d3dAffected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before ca408af08544d96769c93a3d81a7f63f61129e95Affected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 55576fa14771d33994c29a9ae960e07bb3f56c20Affected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before dbc4e10619ed87a50e637b96f2e574df36a7a769Affected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 61e372122b6d95aec940fdaea0a16f988f359897Affected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 3924aea2c33df3864929c1acd178bfc29d8f005fAffected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 81982a11406c5da6c6e2b188028e7056e16b7128Affected
  • 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c to before 94a8cea54cd935c54fa2fba70354757c0fc245e3Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 2.6.29Affected
  • before 2.6.29Not affected
  • 5.10.253 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.203 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.167 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.130 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.75 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.18.14 through 6.18.*Not affected
  • 6.19.4 through 6.19.*Not affected
  • 7.0 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.