CVE-2026-52977

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup

State
Published
Severity
Not scored
Published
Jun 24, 2026
Updated
Aug 19, 2026
Reserved
Jun 9, 2026

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup

During wait-requeue-pi (task A) and requeue-PI (task B) the following race can happen:

Task A Task B futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_setup_timer() futex_do_wait() futex_requeue() CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1); CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2); *timeout* futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() requeue_state = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE

*blocks on hb->lock*

futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() futex_requeue_pi_prepare() Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE => -EAGAIN double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2) *retry*

Task B acquires both hb locks and attempts to acquire the PI-lock of the top most waiter (task B). Task A is leaving early due to a signal/ timeout and started removing itself from the queue. It updates its requeue_state but can not remove it from the list because this requires the hb lock which is owned by task B.

Usually task A is able to swoop the lock after task B unlocked it. However if task B is of higher priority then task A may not be able to wake up in time and acquire the lock before task B gets it again. Especially on a UP system where A is never scheduled.

As a result task A blocks on the lock and task B busy loops, trying to make progress but live locks the system instead. Tragic.

This can be fixed by removing the top most waiter from the list in this case. This allows task B to grab the next top waiter (if any) in the next iteration and make progress.

Remove the top most waiter if futex_requeue_pi_prepare() fails. Let the waiter conditionally remove itself from the list in handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup().

Scores

The record has no CVSS score.

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before e5dbae3572757cecc3d3ec7cf96cbcc9cd9f016cAffected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before 4e0ed44e51727d56244a822ab941efe507c47966Affected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before e3f95b1ba242e37093305812df7fdbe7288a43acAffected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before 0aacb6d18f76552e3e0ee25d9f40d21b3486f4cfAffected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before 69a7cfc66405aeaa2483147653d031b3592ffc9cAffected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before 0304d60abb9dcc02bc7fe6d1850f4ca206e8f1a0Affected
  • 07d91ef510fb16a2e0ca7453222105835b7ba3b8 to before bc7304f3ae20972d11db6e0b1b541c63feda5f05Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 5.15Affected
  • before 5.15Not affected
  • 5.15.216 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.175 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.141 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.91 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.18.33 through 6.18.*Not affected
  • 7.0.10 through 7.0.*Not affected
  • 7.1 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.