CVE-2026-80807

nilfs2: reject invalid block index in GC ioctl

State
Published
Severity
Not scored
Published
Sep 4, 2026
Updated
Oct 19, 2026
Reserved
Aug 26, 2026

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nilfs2: reject invalid block index in GC ioctl

Syzbot reported list corruption caused by a double list_add_tail() call on bh->b_assoc_buffers within nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers().

Analysis revealed that the root cause was the insertion of a page/folio with a page index of ULONG_MAX into the page cache via the GC ioctl. filemap_get_folios_tag(), called by nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers(), repeatedly detects a dirty folio with a page index of ULONG_MAX due to index wrap-around, leading to duplicate processing of dirty buffers.

As a preparatory step, the GC ioctl loads the page/folio of the block to be moved during GC and inserts it into the page cache based on information in the nilfs_vdesc structure passed as an argument. Normally, this does not cause issues because the user-space GC library configures the nilfs_vdesc structure properly. However, since there is no range check on the parameters determining the page index, a request with artificially crafted parameters -- such as those generated by Syzbot -- can result in a page/folio being inserted with a page index of ULONG_MAX, triggering the above problem.

This resolves the issue by checking the ranges of 'vd_offset' and 'vd_vblocknr' in the nilfs_vdesc structure that determine the page index, thereby preventing the invalid page/folio insertions.

Scores

The record has no CVSS score.

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before 898404cdf882d7b54f1132f75570984ca3214796Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before ba8a8b563a28d358c45c62a306d421434a058648Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before 3bd064ccc70b85f9a3d53aece29dc8473be5a226Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before a5e776e2937581d67ec5b9b4d27b0f70d7baa6b1Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before 68aa9ab6f8f2895713aa6ddf781463ed8ea5ba44Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before e447f7edb99bd00cec63d6f3049e2e5074946f71Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before ec6ddf271dfa4c7e3147bc2c8b2bad4315f316a1Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before fbcfb75c20d71a5b542ad4ac3b79d10b997c8152Affected
  • 7942b919f7321f95a777d396ff7894a7a83dc9b0 to before a1735eae55448bc79c2da6593455791e886f6ed8Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 2.6.30Affected
  • before 2.6.30Not affected
  • 5.10.269 through 5.10.*Not affected
  • 5.15.220 through 5.15.*Not affected
  • 6.1.187 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.156 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.108 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.18.47 through 6.18.*Not affected
  • 7.1.11 through 7.1.*Not affected
  • 7.2.1 through 7.2.*Not affected
  • 7.3 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.