CVE-2026-89530

svcrdma: Reject inline replies that overflow the pull-up buffer

State
Published
Severity
9.8 Critical
Published
Sep 11, 2026
Updated
Oct 30, 2026
Reserved
Sep 11, 2026

Read the record on cve.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

svcrdma: Reject inline replies that overflow the pull-up buffer

An RPC-over-RDMA client can request a reply, such as an NFS READ payload, without providing a Write list or a Reply chunk to carry it. When such a reply needs more scatter/gather entries than the device's Send Queue supports, svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() selects pull-up and svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg() linearizes the whole reply into sctxt->sc_xprt_buf. That buffer is only sc_max_req_size bytes, while the reply on this path is bounded only by the client's request, so svc_rdma_xb_linearize() copies past the end of the buffer and corrupts adjacent slab memory. The oversized length is then stored in sc_sges[0].length and posted, so the device also reads beyond the mapped region.

The SGE-exhaustion branch is the only pull-up path that can exceed the buffer: the threshold branch pulls up only replies smaller than RPCRDMA_PULLUP_THRESH, and replies that fit the device's SGE budget are sent directly without linearization. Make svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() report -E2BIG when the reply it would pull up cannot fit sc_max_req_size, and fail the request with ERR_CHUNK as RFC 8166 Section 4.5.3 directs rather than dropping the connection.

The helper no longer answers a simple yes/no question: it now reports pull-up, no pull-up, or -E2BIG for a reply too large to linearize. Rename svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() to svc_rdma_check_pull_up() so its name no longer implies a boolean predicate.

Scores

CVSSScoreVectorSource
3.19.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HLinux

Weaknesses

The record names no weakness.

Affected Products

ProductVersions
LinuxLinux
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before b73011049dbe909f73fd9620d94ef1757d7af2ebAffected
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before 8068358f445a11296328ffa7c524701596814a17Affected
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before fcd91b9957462d398792201c239dffaeff1cc8b2Affected
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before 1949dd1576f7a8aa161b1330c6125df9d53046d5Affected
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before 8ec60eb51fae37cd3d334ff26e4a7d6fb21ff7cfAffected
  • e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf to before 0fbe20dfe74b783d255bf389a6ea77aa25dc7860Affected
  • 9b65b18f817d9ada2bf67351f24bdcce6789a0bbAffected
  • d564356e1919d1178568c19af410cfc1a9076663Affected
  • 4.19.22 to before 4.20Affected
  • 4.20.9 to before 4.21Affected
LinuxLinux
  • 5.0Affected
  • before 5.0Not affected
  • 6.1.191 through 6.1.*Not affected
  • 6.6.160 through 6.6.*Not affected
  • 6.12.109 through 6.12.*Not affected
  • 6.18.50 through 6.18.*Not affected
  • 7.2.4 through 7.2.*Not affected
  • 7.3 and laterNot affected

References

Every record here comes from the CVE Program’s CVE List. © 1999–2026 The MITRE Corporation. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. The records are reproduced under the CVE Program terms of use.